Recently, the Zeitgeist Movement has demonstrated how flawed their reality is, and how in truth, the ideology of the Zeitgeist Movement pushes people into a sick conspiracy driven lust for murder and destruction as a means to a end, the end being Peter Josephs Utopia.
Peter Joseph, as a near GOD to his followers, whose own words are almost scripture to his demented cult, did nothing to stop the constant cries for the murder of innocents, from not one, but many of his followers on a thread recently in a forum. His only input in the ordeal was to help prevent the FBI from finding out about his movements plan to kill innocent people:
The video in question was posted by myself turning the terrorist plot over to the FBI, as others from the world famous Conspiracy Science forum had done.
Soon after, Peter Joseph deleted the thread, to cover the murder plot from the prying eyes of law enforcement. Thankfully, Rolando De Los Muertos (no affiliation with the blogger Muertos) preserved screenshots, and the Conspiracy Science forum themselves preserved a near complete mirror of the Zeitgeist Movements blog.
ROLANDO DE LOS MUERTOS SCREENSHOTS:
http://s1133.photobucket.com/albums/m591/RonaldoDeLosMuertos/Zeitgeist%20Forum%20Screenshots/
THE REAL ROXETTE/CONSPIRACY SCIENCE MIRROR OF ZEITGEIST FORUM: http://shared.skepticproject.com/citations/4/4e25628eb74bfd7a4ca5d1238619d089d0d1e38e/
http://shared.skepticproject.com/citations/7/7d9fe6bd64e91ece60b6c70828d1564433c0d78e/
Peter Josephs Favorite Zeitgeist Member, Now He Needs More
Until now, I had not really given much thought to TZM except as the butt of jokes. My interest was the history of religion and the stuff in Part I of the first film was just nuts and the sources used to support it little more than nineteenth century occultists and pseudoscholars with the occasional out-of-context citation of some current scholar. I was a little curious as to why when I always made it clear I was not dealign with TZM but only Part I of the first film, I was accused of attacking the movement. So much for the “the movie is not the movement.”
As for the RBE stuff, I was amused at PJM’s sudden worship of Jacques “Buckminster Fuller wannabe” Fresco and TVP just as it had been for Jordan Maxwell earlier. It was even funnier when Fresco left them at the altar and for all intents and purposes called them clueless. Talk about a slap in the face! I honestly thought TZM was idiotic but harmless as far as any sort violence stuff goes. I chalked off the occasional outbursts that hinted at the violent sides of individuals as just that: someone’s personal demons. Even the Jared Loughner thing was something crazy he might have latched onto as Mason had a Beatles’ song. Crazy people come to crazy conclusions.
I am rethinking that now. I still believe TZM was not a threat to do anything violent and most in TZM would have quashed such nonsense. But it seems to have dawned on folks that PJM really is a tinfoil hat guy at heart and the first movie is his baby. The second movie was an “addendum” to the first and the third (“moving forward”) indicates it was using the first two as starting points. The three movies and the movement are part of a franchise. You cannot separate them.
What you have now is the end of the road hardcore PJM fanboy crackpots at the helm. Other “members” have moved on with their lives. This is what happens when movements fail and only the cultish followers remain. One can almost predict the refrain of “This must be a plot by Freemasonic Jesuit Illuminatists from the Planet Nibiru! Off with their heads!!” I’ll be curious to see how TZM followers who like to portray their movement as rational and scientific spin this one.
Pingback: The Zeitgeist Movement and Occupy UK: An Anti-Globalisation Cult. « Tendance Coatesy