“Anonymous” Websites Expose Zeitgeist Movement Suppression Tactics   24 comments

Currently, two ANON websites have featured this blog on the front page of their websites:

http://www.anonyops.com/anonnews/ 

AND HERE:  http://anonnews.org/

The ANON site also had this video titled “Anonymous Message To The Zeitgeist Movement and Venus Project + TZM Censorship”:

The censored video in question is featured on this blog post:  Zeitgeist Attempts to Hijack Occupy Wall Street Movement to Create New Global Government

I will upload the video a third time, this time with an ANON LOGO, since they are aware of Zeitgeist Censor Tactics:

ANONYMOUS

UPDATE:  ZEITGEIST ONCE AGAIN BROUGHT DOWN THE VIDEO.  ANONYMOUS LOGO AND ALL, THEY CARE LITTLE THAT THEY ARE PROPOSING A NEW CENTRAL GOVERNMENT BUILT BY ATTORNEYS, TECHNICIANS, AND SELECTED ORGANIZERS AND PEOPLE WANT TO CRITIQUE AND SPEAK UP ABOUT IT.

ANON had previously released this statement about ZEITGEIST MOVEMENT:

Hello, leaders of Zeitgeist movement and Venus project. We are Anonymous.

Over the years, we have been watching you. Your campaigns of misinformation; suppression of dissent; your litigious nature, all of these things have caught our eye. With the zeitgeist movement and venus project leaders Peter Joseph Merola , Jacque Fresco and Roxanne Meadows, working in collaboration in making and releasing propaganda conspiracy theory videos being ZEITGEIST THE MOVIE, ZEITGEIST ADDENDUM, and among other propaganda conspiracy theorist videos the zeitgeist movement and Venus project will soon release into mainstream circulation, the extent of your malign influence over those who have come to trust you as leaders, has been made clear to us. Anonymous has therefore decided that your organization should be destroyed. For the good of your followers, for the good of mankind and for our own enjoyment we shall precede to expel you from the Internet and systematically dismantle the Zeitgeist movement and the Venus project in its present form. We recognize you as a serious opponents, and do not expect our campaign to be completed in a short time frame. However, you will not prevail forever against the angry masses of the body politic. Your choice of methods, hypocrisy, and the artlessness of your organization have sounded its death knell.

You have nowhere to hide because we are everywhere.

you will find no recourse in attack because for each of us that falls, 10 more will take this place. we are cognizant of the many who would decry our methods as parallel to Zeitgeist movement and Venus project. Those who espouse the obvious truth that your organization will use the action of anonymous as a example of persecution of which have so long warned your followers. This is acceptable to anonymous. In fact it is encouraged. we are your SPs

Overtime as we begin to merge our pulse with that of your “Cult”, the suppression of your followers will become increasingly difficult to maintain. Believers will become aware, that salvation needn’t come at the expense of their lively hood. They will become aware that the stress and the frustration they feel is not do to us but a source much closer to them. yes, we are SPs, But the sum of suppression we could ever muster is eclipsed by that of the RTC.

Knowledge is free.

We are Anonymous.

We are Legion.

We do not forgive.

We do not forget.

Expect us.

24 responses to “Anonymous” Websites Expose Zeitgeist Movement Suppression Tactics

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. I’m trying to wrap my head about this battle you seem to be fighting (against ghosts?). So peter is trying to censor a video to stop it going out… while having it uploaded on his YouTube channel?


  2. Bitches don’t know bout my fair use.

    Also go ahead and DMCA me, I’ll just counter notice. I don’t care about my identity. If I can deal with Scientology, I can deal with some punk internet tough guys.

  3. I dont get why there is so much anger against TZM they are not a cult there is nothing to worship. The information that is being discussed is primarily against our financial system most of it is not conspiracy and they really focus on social science. Livelyhood does not exist in most peoples lives so i dont understand where your coming from when you say that they are going to take it away?
    We all agree that world is going wrong but how can I put my confidence in something that shows anger and resentment toward a group of people who at worst are idealogic. It seems to me whenever a person or a group of people express an idea toward a better life for all humanity they are assasinated. So are you the assasins this time? MLK jr, John lennon, Ghandi, JFK, Abraham Lincoln…
    I think it is time to give peace a chance… come together… and be the change we want to see in the world. So stop wasting your time bashing; have a conversation with someone from TZM to work through yours and their misunderstandings… dont assume a hijack is taking place…

    • You worship magic robots.

      If, according to you, the real helpers get assassinated I guess Fresco and Merola aren’t helping because they are still alive. I would point out that’s a retarded requirement to help. Norman Borlaug is responsible for saving the lives of billions of people and I’m sure a lot TZM would love to go back in time and assassinate him for the work he’s done.

  4. Norman Borlaug was a great man but what he did helped agriculture in a profitable sense. More wheat yield was all the investors “ford and rockefeller” saw. Borlaug also stated “future food-production increases will have to come from higher yields. And though I have no doubt yields will keep going up, whether they can go up enough to feed the population monster is another matter. Unless progress with agricultural yields remains very strong, the next century will experience sheer human misery that, on a numerical scale, will exceed the worst of everything that has come before”.
    So his attempts at helping world hunger were in vain my friend. They didnt kill him because they need those slaves to have food. He was the answer at the time. There have been many people who have helped its the ones who want to change the system, so poverty and famine are a thing of the past; its them who are assasinated. People who do what they are told are usually okay.

    • Fuck you, Norman Borlaug was the greatest man to ever live, period. His contributions to agriculture saved a BILLION lives. He saved a billion lives from starvation while Fresco was drawing Tomarrowland houses for a profit. How many lives has Fresco saved? Not a fucking single one. Instead he just leaches off people and begs for money to make silly movies for him so he can make himself look better. Bitching and moaning about the profit motive while he sells TVP coffee cups while you accuse a man who is doing the footwork in feeding people a slave driver. Fuck you, fuck you, fuck you.

      Fuck you you self righteous fundamentalist nutjob.

  5. First of all i have already seen that video. Your a moron I havent said a word about Jack Fresno for starters I never called Borlaug a slave driver I’m calling the investors slave drivers. Although your angry and speaking through your anger, I respect your opinion. I said Norman was a great man, but the world is still controlled with the same attitude as it always has been so that being said; there are plenty of good ideas out there to help famine in general it’s up to the people with the money to make them happen. BUT THEY DON’T and thats why these movements occur and people get mad. I am being rushed ill get back to you.

    • Norman Borlaug: 1 billion lives saved
      Jacque Fresco: 0 lives saved
      Peter Joseph Merola: 0 lives saved
      steve0: 0 lives saved.

      But TZM would have no remorse if he was assassinated, being that they constantly demonize his work. Instead most of you idiots want 100% organic farming which will result with 1/3 of the world starving to death. I guess that’s the real plan for depopulating the world, right?

  6. wow another nwo conspiracy theorist… I cant waste any more of my time with you. It is possible to support all these people without destroying all our natural resources. Whats gonna happen when we run out of oil dipshit? What gonna happen when our soil wont yeild crops any longer huh you fucking un-educated moron. What is the point of saving lives if they are just going to be tortured and diseased lives? If you would look into the technological aspects of human progress you would se we have the means to support billions with no major effects on our planet. We are all going to die because of morons who focus on the past. Jacque and peter and all the other “idealists” are trying… what the fuck are you doing? Bitching and complaining about how much you hate them when your basing all your judgements on what research. We can organically farm in 3 dimensions( Meaning not just on a plot of flat land) using hydroponics and aeroponics using half or less of the current nutrients and water we use now. Like a skyscraper full of led’s and growing vegetation using nutrients and water that can be recycled over and over again. If its not going to bring profit though who is going to invest in it? Keep eating those south american veggies buddy enjoy your systemic pesticides and eventual cancers, cause if you dont get cancer how is our health system going to stay afloat? Stop being so mad
    Thats all I can say at this point I just got home from work and I need to put my kids to bed…
    good luck

    • No, your camp is the one with all the conspiracy nuts. Fresco is on the record describing methods of population control, Merola is on the record as supporting a one child policy, and you are on the record as not being able to take a snide joke. Besides, even if I did but the whole illumanati/NWO nonsense, The Zeitgeist Movement is far to incompetent to pull off a test city, let alone a state or world government. Fuck, they couldn’t even get 100 people to come to a free concert in Los Angeles last month.

      “Whats gonna happen when we run out of oil dipshit?”
      1. We’re not running out of oil.
      2. when we get close, prices go up, and demands for alternatives goes up and entrepreneurs will fill those demands. Basic economics. Shouldn’t of ditched school.
      3. It’s a non-sequitur. We are running out of oil -> We need RBE. Does not follow.

      “What gonna happen when our soil wont yeild crops any longer huh you fucking un-educated moron”
      1. LOL collapse porn. There’s no reason to belive this will happen
      2. Again, non-sequir. Our dirt will become too toxic to grow food -> We need an RBE DOES NOT FOLLOW

      “What is the point of saving lives if they are just going to be tortured and diseased lives?”
      Oh yes, I forgot how bad your live is with computers and high speed internet. Forgive me while I dine on my caviar and filet mignon for not noticing your suffering. I didn’t know your peasant veggies tasted so bad. Let them eat cake!

      ” If you would look into the technological aspects of human progress you would se we have the means to support billions with no major effects on our planet.”
      Again, does not follow. There’s any number of economic models that that address this, RBE (being the least coherent of the bunch) is one of many.

      “We are all going to die because of morons who focus on the past.”
      Those who forget the past are doomed to repeat it.

      “Jacque and peter and all the other “idealists” are trying… what the fuck are you doing?”
      Educating people on the dangers of collectivism.

      “We can organically farm in 3 dimensions( Meaning not just on a plot of flat land) using hydroponics and aeroponics using half or less of the current nutrients and water we use now. Like a skyscraper full of led’s and growing vegetation using nutrients and water that can be recycled over and over again.”
      That sounds interesting. Meanwhile in reality…
      http://www.treehugger.com/files/2010/05/vertical-farms-food-problems.php

      For obvious reasons, no one has ever proposed stacking solar photovoltaic panels one above the other. For the same reasons, crop fields cannot be layered one above the other without providing a substitute for the sunlight that has been cut off….As a result, the lion’s share of a vertical farm’s lighting would have to be supplied artificially, consuming resource-intensive electricity rather than free sunlight. This led us to wonder, “What would be the consequences of a vertical-farming effort large enough to allow us to remove from the landscape, say, the United States’ 53 million acres of wheat?”…Our calculations, based on the efficiency of converting sunlight to plant matter, show that just to meet a year’s U.S. wheat production with vertical farming would, for lighting alone, require eight times as much electricity as all U.S. utilities generate in an entire year.

      Other fun reading:
      http://www.alternet.org/food/146686/why_planting_farms_in_skyscrapers_won%27t_solve_our_food_problems?page=entire
      http://www.greens.org/s-r/index.html
      (note how all of these links come from left wing environmental nutters like yourself)

      “If its not going to bring profit though who is going to invest in it?”
      Yea, because there’s no money in food. Idiot.

      “Keep eating those south american veggies buddy enjoy your systemic pesticides and eventual cancers, cause if you dont get cancer how is our health system going to stay afloat? Stop being so mad”
      My veggies and fruit come from California, Florida and Mexico. Modern pesticides have not been linked to cancer and are scientifically formulated to be non-toxic for human consumption. Oh, right this is not a scientific movement. I’m sorry.

  7. University of michigan on soil degredation, http://www.globalchange.umich.edu/globalchange2/current/lectures/land_deg/land_deg.html

    Food and soil – http://www.theglobaleducationproject.org/earth/food-and-soil.php

    Here is a nice list of environmental impacts by humans from nasa – http://gcmd.nasa.gov/KeywordSearch/Keywords.do?
    Portal=GCMD&KeywordPath=Parameters%7CHUMAN+DIMENSIONS%7CENVIRONMENTAL+IMPACTS&MetadataType=0&lbnode=mdlb3

    Scientific american stated – Together the world’s 6.8 billion people use land equal in size to South America to grow food and raise livestock—an astounding agricultural footprint. And demographers predict the planet will host 9.5 billion people by 2050. Because each of us requires a minimum of 1,500 calories a day, civilization will have to cultivate another Brazil’s worth of land—2.1 billion acres—if farming continues to be practiced as it is today. That much new, arable earth simply does not exist. To quote the great American humorist Mark Twain: “Buy land. They’re not making it any more.”
    http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=the-rise-of-vertical-farms

    Ohh and then theres water, there has been significant public attention paid to the issue of water scarcity lately, and for good reason. Although water is a renewable resource, it is also a finite one. Only 2.53 percent of earth’s water is fresh, and some two-thirds of that is locked up in glaciers and permanent snow cover. But despite the very real danger of future global water shortages, for the vast majority of the nearly one billion people without safe drinking water, today’s water crisis is not an issue of scarcity, but of access. Today, nearly one billion people (about one in eight) lack access to clean water. More than twice that many, 2.5 billion people, don’t have access to a toilet.
    http://peakwater.org/

    I can post links all day too If I want… the fact is no matter what I say or what you say we both think we are right. When money is the focus people starve. We are repeating the past by the way remember rome?

    ohh and one more thing

    Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Karolinska Institute and Radiumhemmet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.-
    Epidemiologic evidence on the relationship between chemical pesticides and cancer is reviewed. In animal studies, many pesticides are CARCINOGENIC, (e.g., organochlorines, creosote, and sulfallate) while others (notably, the organochlorines DDT, chlordane, and lindane) are tumor promoters. Some contaminants in commercial pesticide formulations also may pose a carcinogenic risk. In humans, arsenic compounds and insecticides used occupationally have been classified as carcinogens by the International Agency for Research on Cancer. Human data, however, are limited by the small number of studies that evaluate individual pesticides. Epidemiologic studies, although sometimes contradictory, have linked phenoxy acid herbicides or contaminants in them with soft tissue sarcoma (STS) and malignant lymphoma; organochlorine insecticides are linked with STS, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL), leukemia, and, less consistently, with cancers of the lung and breast; organophosphorous compounds are linked with NHL and leukemia; and triazine herbicides with ovarian cancer.

    I have a headache and have a life full of shit to take care of; you know everything I am sorry. My children are going to suffer because of people like you. Their futures are being set up to fail, because we are below the poverty level. So go watch some more Faux news and brainwash yourself a bit more.

    and no I cant take a joke anymore I barely ever smile….

    • zeitgeist at its core is a ONENESS RELIGION. If you read the Zeitgeist orientation Guide, it states during the conclusion that the whole point is the religion of science.. Peter Joseph says “SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY IS DIVINITY IN ACTION” and “SCIENCE IS THE TOOL FOR FUNCTIONAL SPIRITUALITY”. So the reason zeitgeist members think they are scientific and try to act like science is on their side (even tho no scientific journal/article/scientist mentions ZEITGEIST/RBE in any favorable light) is because science is their religion! Peter Joseph believes MANKIND is God, and he wants to create a new god-man society, since he is obviously influenced by the THEOSOPHISTS like Hitler was. One world government, one world religion of god men. Sick stuff. So when a Zeitgeist Zombie tries to act scientific, remember they are just stroking their spirituality, the oneness zeitgeist cult religion, with Peter Joseph as high priest.

    • soil degradation: Even still, your study is 20 years old, a lot has changed since then. Again, non-sequitur. We have bad soil -> We need an RBE. DOES NOT FOLLOW.
      Source 2: Crank site. Most of it’s sources are crank books. Not even wasting my time on it. Again, non-sequitur. We have bad soil -> We need an RBE. DOES NOT FOLLOW.

      This Scientific American article never makes the claim that these are possible and even raises some skepticism and predates my articles. So are you for updated information or relying on your old articles. That’s very unscientific of you, Mr. Science pants. Even still it’s a non-sequitur; We want vertical farms -> weed need an RBE? How so?

      “Ohh and then theres water, there has been significant public attention paid to the issue of water scarcity lately, and for good reason. Although water is a renewable resource, it is also a finite one. ”
      Right, because water can’t ever be cleaned or filtered. Peak water, Jesus was a bullshit crank website. Even still it’s a non-sequitur; ‘We’re running out of water’ equals ‘we need and RBE’ exactly?

      Carcinogens: Meanwhile in reality… FDA and EPA has rigid rules and regulations regarding pesticides that can be used on commercial crops that limits the amount of potential carcinogens and how much residual pesticides my ride on the plants. http://www.fda.gov/Food/FoodSafety/FoodContaminantsAdulteration/Pesticides/default.htm
      http://www.epa.gov/opp00001/health/cancerfs.htm
      Again non-sequitur; These pesticides are bad -> We need an RBE? Does not follow.

      “My children are going to suffer because of people like you.”
      No, if anything they will suffer because people like you are too busy absorbing conspiracy theories than getting a real education expecting other to toil for you instead of bettering themselves and working for a better future. Your kids live a live of wealth people in collectivized states could only dream of no matter where you are on the economic scale. So explain to me why you’re below the poverty level but still able to afford a computer with high speed internet? I bet you have a cell phone too. It’s so easy to bitch about capitalism while you reap the rewards of it. If capitalism is so bad, I invite you to move to the great countries of North Korea, Zimbabwe, Cuba, or Venezuela. I’m sure you’re kids would finally not suffer if they are guaranteed a bowl of rice a day for forced labor.

  8. I need a cell phone I have children and need to be connected just incase i am needed i work on the road and have no other means of com. also internet is neccesary for communication purposes and i have been exposed to it for so long i feel as though i need it i “feel” insecure without it. I cant waste anymore time with this fight because it is too stressful. You have too much faith in your government I dont trust anybody other than my kids anyway so go fuck yourself and we will see what the future brings because only the future will tell…

    • You can’t waste anymore time because you know you’re wrong. Enjoy your capitalist computers and cell phones to bash capitalism.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 39 other followers